I have had an experience that I can't find documented, so it may be something that I am doing or I have found an undocumented feature.
In a diagram, with many associative hatched regions and their boundaries, I was getting tired of sending each hatch to the BACK as a separate command.
So a selected several hatched regions and did one command to send them all BACK. This appeared to work as I could now select the individual boundaries of those regions.
However, if I select one of those hatched regions, ALL REGIONS sent to the back by one command, become selected. I have found no way to break this linkage. In the end I had do a single delete that removed all of the selected hatched regions (from that one BACK command) and then redo the hatched and backing for each region separately.
Is this a bug?
If not where is it documented and how do you break that linkage?
In a diagram, with many associative hatched regions and their boundaries, I was getting tired of sending each hatch to the BACK as a separate command.
So a selected several hatched regions and did one command to send them all BACK. This appeared to work as I could now select the individual boundaries of those regions.
However, if I select one of those hatched regions, ALL REGIONS sent to the back by one command, become selected. I have found no way to break this linkage. In the end I had do a single delete that removed all of the selected hatched regions (from that one BACK command) and then redo the hatched and backing for each region separately.
Is this a bug?
If not where is it documented and how do you break that linkage?